Evidence
Supporting Evidence for Speedometer Tolerance
The following is a list of supporting evidence regarding knowledge by the Government as to the problem regarding speedometer error.
|
Basis of tolerance being applied to Infringement Notices |
|
What the Victorian Regulations state on vehicle speedometers |
|
What the Victorian Parliament Road Safety Committee report Walk Safety states. |
|
What the Commonwealth Department of Transport and Regional Services said. |
|
What the Victorian Parliament Road Safety Committee said. |
|
What Monash Accident Research Centre has to say. |
|
What Victorian Government undertook to do. |
In the Melbourne Magistrates case number S02748905 the charge was travelling at 66 km/h in 60 km/h zone.
Prosecutors Summary stated “The legislative tolerance of 3 kilometres per hour or 3% has been allowed in this matter.”
There is no reference to the word “Tolerance” in the Legislation with respect to measurement of speed. This word is only used once in the Victorian Road Safety (General) Regulations 1999 in clause 410 with respect to dynamic axle weighing devices.
What the Victorian Road Safety (General) Regulations 1999 do specify under regulation 306 is that:
Whether 2% or 3% applies varies depending on which type of device is being used. In common language terms, a radar device is 2% and a speed camera 3%. The detail is provided under regulation 302 of the Regulations.
These are not a references to Legislative tolerance with respect to compliance with Road Rule 20. They are statements regarding the accuracy of the measurement device, the speed camera or radar device.
|